HyPhy message board | |
http://www.hyphy.org/cgi-bin/hyphy_forums/YaBB.pl
Datamonkey Server >> Datamonkey feedback >> Discordant results using SLAC, FEL and REL http://www.hyphy.org/cgi-bin/hyphy_forums/YaBB.pl?num=1333610166 Message started by Kenny on Apr 5th, 2012 at 12:16am |
Title: Discordant results using SLAC, FEL and REL Post by Kenny on Apr 5th, 2012 at 12:16am
Hi,
I'm currently using datamonkey for my thesis on research on a HIV-1 cluster of 70 patients. On one dataset, the SLAC, FEL and REL analysis gave following results: SLAC REL FEL All 3 POS 8 64 20 8 NEG 36 36 44 22 My first question: for this moment I'm taking only the sites under selection that are present in all tree the analysis. Is this a misinterpretation? Do I then reject to many possible sites under selection? Second question: For another dataset, I get similar results on the SLAC and FEL analysis, but the REL gives very strange results. The sites that are under positive selection in SLAC and FEL came back as negative selected sites in the REL analysis and the same for the negative selected sites. Can anyone explain this discordance ? Many thanks Kenny |
Title: Re: Discordant results using SLAC, FEL and REL Post by Sergei on Apr 5th, 2012 at 10:55am
Hi Kenny,
To find positive selection, I would recommend using a new method MEME, available on Datamonkey. REL is not particularly reliable when calling individual sites under selection, especially for smaller data sets, and we are in the process of replacing it with a more robust alternative in the next few months. For negative selection, please use FEL. Generally SLAC < FEL < REL in terms of power to detect sites (e.g. in your row 1 this is a clear pattern), so intersecting the set of all sites will usually reduce to whatever SLAC found (which will be the most conservative). Sergei |
Title: Re: Discordant results using SLAC, FEL and REL Post by Kenny on Apr 5th, 2012 at 11:40am
Hi Sergei,
Thanks for the quick reply. Regarding my second question about the discordance between the FEL and REL results (positve in one method, negative in the other one). I tested a couple of weeks a dataset of HIV Gag gene and there all tree methods (SLAC, FEL and REL) gave the same site under positive and negative selection. When I test today the same dataset, the results of SLAC and FEL correspond, but the results of REL are opposite. Please see the files in attachment to understand a little better what I mean. It's driving me crazy that it won't work anymore and these results don't correspond. Is it possible that there's a bug in the REL analysis (switching negative and positive)? Kind regards Kenny |
Title: Re: Discordant results using SLAC, FEL and REL Post by Sergei on Apr 5th, 2012 at 5:21pm
Hi Kenny,
This does look very odd; I checked the results in HyPhy directly, and site assignments on Datamonkey are inverted. Let me investigate and post a solution here. Thanks very much for reporting the issue. Sergei |
Title: Re: Discordant results using SLAC, FEL and REL Post by Kenny on Apr 6th, 2012 at 4:09am
Hi Sergei,
Many thanks for the quick solution and congrats for your excellent server (Datamonkey) ! Kind regards Kenny |
HyPhy message board » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |