Welcome, Guest. Please Login
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
RATE HETEROGENEITY (Read 1948 times)
YER
Ex Member


RATE HETEROGENEITY
Oct 27th, 2005 at 3:09am
 
Hello all,

I have conducted branch-site analyses to identify positively selected codons on specified branches using PAML.

In contrast to PAML, using branch-specific analyses of codon selection pressures in HYPHY, I regularly find non-signficicant results when applying non-synonymous rate heterogeneity.

Has anyone had similar experiences and, if so, is this logical? I think this finding is unlikely to be widespread if different codon positions are involved in positive selection on an amino acid. Still, many of the codons in the genes I examined are not variable in only one of the three codon positions.

Any ideas on this?

Thanks, Yer
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sergei
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Datamonkeys are forever...

Posts: 1658
UCSD
Gender: male
Re: RATE HETEROGENEITY
Reply #1 - Oct 27th, 2005 at 7:43am
 
Dear Yer,

I am not sure I understand exactly what is going on with your analyses. PAML finds significant results, and HyPhy doesn't? Also, which HyPhy analysis (and options) did you use to check for lineage and site specific selection? What was the size and divergence level of your alignment?

Generally speaking, fixed effects sites methods in HyPhy tend to be less powerful (for smaller datasets) than the random effects models in PAML, but, because of their non-parametric nature, tend to have lower rates of false positives.

Cheers,
Sergei


Back to top
 

Associate Professor
Division of Infectious Diseases
Division of Biomedical Informatics
School of Medicine
University of California San Diego
WWW WWW  
IP Logged