Hi Kim,
The fact that you are getting noticeably different results suggests that the analysis is unduly sensitive to the settings, and should probably not be used for the file at hand.
For instance, in the HyPhy run, were the Bayes factors for the 3 selected sites (from the datamonkey.org) analysis just below the significance level, or a lot below it (e.g. 15 vs 20, or 2 vs 20)?
To answer your specific questions
1). Datamonkey uses 3x4 frequency parameterizations under MG94x(abcdef) model, where abcdef depends on user selection at the analysis set up page.
2). Datamonkey uses nucleotide-based branch lengths
3,4). Datamonkey uses 3x3 GDD rate variation. Sometimes a few of these rate classes have 0 weights (especially for smaller datasets)
5). dNdSresultsprocessor.bf cannot generate the same tables as what you see in Datamonkey, sorry.
Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!! You need to
Finally, I would strongly encourage you to use the new FUBAR method in place of REL (Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!! You need to
, also see Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!! You need to
).
Sergei