Welcome, Guest. Please Login
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
Tree reconstruction (Read 1811 times)
matty
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


zzzzzzzzz

Posts: 6
Tree reconstruction
Jul 11th, 2007 at 10:04am
 
Hey Sergei,

First off we want to thank you for all your help in the BEB thread.  It was very useful and we managed to accomplish all that you set out for us.  It really helped us understand our results better.

Now we have one simple question:  When doing all the analyses that we have done using HYPHY, should we use the tree inferred using HYPHY and PHYLIP via ML?  I am asking because the tree returned from ML estimate does not have the correct speciation order, i.e. the  one that has been shown in literature.  When we try to get a ML estimate using the tree with the correct speciation order, we get a lower ML score than the inferred tree.
Thanks,
Matt
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sergei
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Datamonkeys are forever...

Posts: 1658
UCSD
Gender: male
Re: Tree reconstruction
Reply #1 - Jul 11th, 2007 at 10:51am
 
Dear Matt,

For selection the tree has a fairly small effect on rate estimates, unless it is really wrong; you can run both to see if it makes a difference.

I would use the 'correct' tree, unless there is reason to believe that your gene tree is different.

Cheers,
Sergei
Back to top
 

Associate Professor
Division of Infectious Diseases
Division of Biomedical Informatics
School of Medicine
University of California San Diego
WWW WWW  
IP Logged